Lightroom vs. Aperture… again
Since Apple released Aperture 3 a few weeks ago lots of folks are debating the pros and cons of Lightroom vs. Aperture. It’s natural for folks to want to take sides, and pick one program over the other. It’s equally unlikley that most people will be able to effectively use both products, which supports the need to choose one.
I’ve casually used and kept up with Aperture updates since it was first released. After all, I’m a huge Mac fan. For twenty years I have passionately preferred all things Mac to anything Windows.
When Aperture 1 came out, it was a time of dramatic change in photography, when digital cameras were starting to become more popular than film. Clearly, new software was needed to support the new digital photo workflow. Though other software had been produced in attempts to deal with this (Adobe Camera Raw and Bridge, Capture One, iView Media Pro etc.) Aperture really represented a significant improvement in the photographer’s workflow. (And this was before Lightroom came out.)
I still love most Apple products and always stay current with what they are up to. In several ways, Apple is well poised to change computing as we know it – as they have done several times in the past. So I never count Apple out – even in the case of Lightroom vs. Aperture.
When it comes to the important and difficult choice, then, of what software to use to process our digital photographs, when clients, students and people in the general public ask me why I prefer Lightroom over Aperture, here’s what I say:
1. Platform independence: true, I believe OS X is a superior operating system to all flavors of Windows (even 7, which doesn’t suck). That said, I think it’s a big mistake to limit your work to using Macs only… and Aperture currently will only run on a Mac (and a new, fast one at that). I myself use both Mac and Windows every day in my work, and being able to use Lightroom on both platforms is a huge advantage. Maybe someday, the majority of people will be using Macs (we can only hope) but until that day, platform independence is essential.
2. Company focus: Adobe is the undisputed champion in digital imaging software. I trust their products completely and they have led the way for two decades. Though there will always be little things that we wish Adobe would add or improve, there is no doubt that the people working for Adobe are the best and brightest in the business. Conversely, Apple contunues to show it is really a hardware company. That happens to have some really kick-ass operating systems, oh, and the industry leading video editing program
3. Workflow: there are some really crazy, frustrating things about working with Aperture. One example is the Image Vault concept. This is very much like the approach taken by the horrible iPhoto, and serves no purpose other than to ensure it will be difficult to migrate away from Aperture in the future. I myself have helped a number of people through the extremely painful and nervewracking process of moving from Aperture to Lightroom. On the other hand, Lightroom’s handling of files is simple and unobtrusive. You could safely use Lightroom for all your photos for the next few years, then switch to something else, essentially without a hitch. Not so with Aperture.
These three points illustrate the main reasons why I believe Lightroom is still the way to go. The list could go on and on; other folks have already talked about Lightroom’s superior noise reduction, processing algorithms etc.
One way that I agree Aperture outshines Lightroom is the interface itself. Lightroom is designed to let you easily get the interface “out of the way” while you’re working; there are lots of cool tools to work directly on your photo, with only the photo showing on the screen. However, Aperture’s interface is clean, elegant and beautiful, providing the kind of experience where you might not want to get the interface out of the way.
Unfortunately, for me (and I believe the vast majority of photographers) the interface itself is not a good enough reason to choose one product over another.
I hope this article helps you understand why Lightroom is the better choice. I’d love to hear your thoughts, comments and questions on this topic.
Thanks for reading!



I’m just finishing your Lightroom 2 Book. I switched from Aperture to Lightroom for some of the reasons you mentioned above, plus some. It’s frustrating because I use Macs and Apple products and want Aperture to be it for me. It would all integrate so nicely with my, iPhone, iMovie, etc. But Apple has been a letdown lately. Updates are so slow to arrive, cameras not supported in a timely manner, the demands on the machines are overwhelming making Aperture run sluggishly, and as you said, I don’t like depending on Apple’s OS to keep me going. The software needs to be independent from the OS. I also strongly agree that Adobe has people working on this stuff that really know what they’re doing. Thanks for your post.
Jerry, thanks for your comment. And thanks for buying my book!! I hope it’s been a great help.
I have to admit that choosing specific software (and hardware!) for my imaging has been difficult… nothing is perfect. And some products are definitely sexier than others.
I usually end up going with whatever presents the most flexibility. Fortunately or unfortunately, that usually means some amount of compromise.
I think Adobe understands this. Apple certainly is not about flexibility, or compromise in any way. Both approaches have served each company well and I support them both wholeheartedly. But the fact that I use Lightroom as my primary workflow tool is entirely practical, not emotional.
And emotion is something that has always been essential for Apple
Hello,
I fully agree here,
i have been using Lightroom for a long time and have several books up on the subject including yours , lately i have (fooled myself) also installed Aperture 3 and i was amazed what happened to the catalog file ? It went almost as big as the real size in my LR folders ? 300G !
So i had to delete that catalog before it was finished to prevent accidents to happen.
due to the fact of just a 500G HDD on my MBP that is for 75% used !
This already made me feel real good that i was so used to Lightroom and the way it works with in folder arrangement , i really like to be in control of where what is or needs to go to.
And that is a Big issue in Aperture , and we where just started not a good beginning.
After browsing many forums on that topic i could reduce the size from Aperture’s catalog to about 15gyg on my HDD and for just the same this only is 80Meg for LightRoom
After all, i had fooled myself so i needed to make the best of a bad situation.
Now that that was dun i was a little more happy and then only because i could use some of
my LR edit tools and plugins direct in Aperture thats the main reason why i have took that step.
Aperture uses also way more cpu and ram for just the same editing tool , has apple lost there
software/hardware integrated Touch ? I really don’t know?
LR is still for me the best way to go , and sometimes you use assistance from a third party
And if they surprise me in a positive and creative way,
i can always reconsider what to use
Koen
I just installed windows 7 64 bit, we are having trouble with getting LR Version to Work any help?
Rhonda
Hi Rhonda-
Lightroom has separate installers for 32 and 64 bit Windows. Make sure you’ve got the right one. I haven’t heard any other problems with Windows 7 and Lightroom, but I am using a 32 bit machine. Please let me know if you don’t get it worked out, or if you do, what solutions were involved. Thanks!
[...] great tools to use. For me, there’s no clear winner is this debate, but you can find plenty of passionate posts around the web by photographers and photo enthusiasts who extol the pros and cons of each [...]
Great post. I’m trying to decide between Aperture 3 or migrating my Aperture 2 over to LR. Any advice on the transition?
@Eric Martin
I’ve worked with several clients migrating from Aperture to Lightroom. Depending on how you’ve handled file management in Aperture, the migration can either be super-simple or an absolute nightmare.
If you’ve imported your photos into the Aperture vault, you should export them out again in order for Lightroom to efficiently work with them. (That being said, you can import photos contained within the vault — or an iPhoto collection — into Lightroom.) It’s just that Aperture’s automatic folder organizing is usually not ideal.
At this point in time, file organization is still an important part of working with photos on your computer. (But, through metadata, I do expect in the near future that our dependency on the file system will become obsolete.)
For now, I recommend storing all your photos in a well organized set of folders on an external hard drive. With this method, you could confidently use either Lightroom or Aperture without problems.
However, Aperture’s processing settings will not carry over to Lightroom, so for any photos you don’t want to rework in LR, you’ll need to export TIFs or another rendered format to preserve your final Aperture results.
Hope this helps; good luck! Let us know what you end up doing.
@Rhonda Thompson
Hi again Rhonda – are you still having trouble? If so, please provide some more detail and I’ll see what I can to do help. Thanks!
Wow, Someone that writes books on Adobe products prefers Lightroom over Aperture. Not exactly a revelation. I discovered your site while looking for information to help with making a decision on whether to consider moving to LR. I found nothing but
1. Platform independence
2. Adobe’s wonderful
3. I hate the vault/Library concept.
Not exactly fresh information and none are compelling reasons to switch, at least for me, as I – 1. Use only Macs
2. I think Adobe products have become far too complicated, bloated and expensive for simple touchup work which is what most of us are doing.
3. The vault concept, whether it is in Aperture, iTunes, or iPhoto simply allows me to concentrate on my photo’s rather than the files and file system. If I do need to find the original master, it is there safely in the library and easily found.
I also noted the cheap shot at the “horrible” iPhoto. iPhoto is certainly not a pro tool, but it brings the world of digital photography to people that would never attempt it with such an accessible tool. I have family that never did more with their cameras that take the card to the store and print the pics that love taking pictures and sharing them since I converted them to Macs and they have iPhoto.
All that said, I am still going to download and try LR3, as I am very interested in seeing what it has to offer. I would prefer not to have to resort to going to PS or Capture NX for things that can be handled non destructively in the workflow program.
Please don’t take this critique the wrong was, I have been through your site and appreciate your efforts, I was just disappointed that this particular article/commentary was pretty shallow.